linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 104/105] btrfs: add missing run of delayed items after unlink during log replay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220307091647.102718054@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  7 Mar 2022 10:19:47 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 104/105] btrfs: add missing run of delayed items after unlink during log replay

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>

commit 4751dc99627e4d1465c5bfa8cb7ab31ed418eff5 upstream.

During log replay, whenever we need to check if a name (dentry) exists in
a directory we do searches on the subvolume tree for inode references or
or directory entries (BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY keys, and BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY
keys as well, before kernel 5.17). However when during log replay we
unlink a name, through btrfs_unlink_inode(), we may not delete inode
references and dir index keys from a subvolume tree and instead just add
the deletions to the delayed inode's delayed items, which will only be
run when we commit the transaction used for log replay. This means that
after an unlink operation during log replay, if we attempt to search for
the same name during log replay, we will not see that the name was already
deleted, since the deletion is recorded only on the delayed items.

We run delayed items after every unlink operation during log replay,
except at unlink_old_inode_refs() and at add_inode_ref(). This was due
to an overlook, as delayed items should be run after evert unlink, for
the reasons stated above.

So fix those two cases.

Fixes: 0d836392cadd5 ("Btrfs: fix mount failure after fsync due to hard link recreation")
Fixes: 1f250e929a9c9 ("Btrfs: fix log replay failure after unlink and link combination")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1286,6 +1286,15 @@ again:
 						 inode, name, namelen);
 			kfree(name);
 			iput(dir);
+			/*
+			 * Whenever we need to check if a name exists or not, we
+			 * check the subvolume tree. So after an unlink we must
+			 * run delayed items, so that future checks for a name
+			 * during log replay see that the name does not exists
+			 * anymore.
+			 */
+			if (!ret)
+				ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans);
 			if (ret)
 				goto out;
 			goto again;
@@ -1537,6 +1546,15 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct
 				 */
 				if (!ret && inode->i_nlink == 0)
 					inc_nlink(inode);
+				/*
+				 * Whenever we need to check if a name exists or
+				 * not, we check the subvolume tree. So after an
+				 * unlink we must run delayed items, so that future
+				 * checks for a name during log replay see that the
+				 * name does not exists anymore.
+				 */
+				if (!ret)
+					ret = btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans);
 			}
 			if (ret < 0)
 				goto out;