linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] drm/virtio: Add memory shrinker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d9c0cdc7-9650-d9e3-e872-4bf22f0c4baa@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:04:42 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
        Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
        Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@...labora.com>
Cc:     Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] drm/virtio: Add memory shrinker


On 3/8/22 16:17, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> @@ -246,20 +246,28 @@ static int virtio_gpu_plane_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
>  	struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct virtio_gpu_framebuffer *vgfb;
>  	struct virtio_gpu_object *bo;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	if (!new_state->fb)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	vgfb = to_virtio_gpu_framebuffer(new_state->fb);
>  	bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(vgfb->base.obj[0]);
> -	if (!bo || (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY && !bo->guest_blob))
> +
> +	err = virtio_gpu_gem_pin(bo);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;

I just noticed that this produces a refcount debug warning because I
missed to initialize the refcount when BO is created. That warning splat
was hidden by a huge lockdep splat produced by
drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(), which probably
should be fixed. I'll correct it in v2.