[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YieG22mgIzsL7TMn@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:39:55 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: ti, tcan104x-can: Document
mux-states property
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 09:40:11AM +0530, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> On some boards, for routing CAN signals from controller to transceivers,
> muxes might need to be set. This can be implemented using mux-states
> property. Therefore, document the same in the respective bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
As the warning without this is still there and it hasn't been resent,
I've applied it.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists