[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiecMTy8ckUdXTQO@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:10:57 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...cinc.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, x86@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/tracing: Don't re-read p->state when
emitting sched_switch event
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 06:02:40PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> +CC stable
>
> On 03/01/22 15:24, tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
> >
> > Commit-ID: fa2c3254d7cfff5f7a916ab928a562d1165f17bb
> > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/fa2c3254d7cfff5f7a916ab928a562d1165f17bb
> > Author: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> > AuthorDate: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:25:19
> > Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > CommitterDate: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 16:18:39 +01:00
> >
> > sched/tracing: Don't re-read p->state when emitting sched_switch event
> >
> > As of commit
> >
> > c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
> >
> > the following sequence becomes possible:
> >
> > p->__state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > __schedule()
> > deactivate_task(p);
> > ttwu()
> > READ !p->on_rq
> > p->__state=TASK_WAKING
> > trace_sched_switch()
> > __trace_sched_switch_state()
> > task_state_index()
> > return 0;
> >
> > TASK_WAKING isn't in TASK_REPORT, so the task appears as TASK_RUNNING in
> > the trace event.
> >
> > Prevent this by pushing the value read from __schedule() down the trace
> > event.
> >
> > Reported-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...cinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220120162520.570782-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
>
> Any objection to picking this for stable? I'm interested in this one for some
> Android users but prefer if it can be taken by stable rather than backport it
> individually.
>
> I think it makes sense to pick the next one in the series too.
What commit does this fix in Linus's tree?
Once it hits Linus's tree, let stable@...r.kernel.org know what the git
commit id is in Linus's tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists