[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h=4JT3yiWz0KetodLV4HrOqse0EUbWUez-1fcy4-6jGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 20:03:28 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] device property: Allow error pointer to be passed
to fwnode APIs
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:36 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 02:37:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Some of the fwnode APIs might return an error pointer instead of NULL
> > or valid fwnode handle. The result of such API call may be considered
> > optional and hence the test for it is usually done in a form of
> >
> > fwnode = fwnode_find_reference(...);
> > if (IS_ERR(fwnode))
> > ...error handling...
> >
> > Nevertheless the resulting fwnode may have bumped the reference count
> > and hence caller of the above API is obliged to call fwnode_handle_put().
> > Since fwnode may be not valid either as NULL or error pointer the check
> > has to be performed there. This approach uglifies the code and adds
> > a point of making a mistake, i.e. forgetting about error point case.
> >
> > To prevent this, allow an error pointer to be passed to the fwnode APIs.
> >
> > Fixes: 83b34afb6b79 ("device property: Introduce fwnode_find_reference()")
> > Reported-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
>
> This is nice! FWIW:
>
> Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Applied as 5.18 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists