linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/2] ACPI: Arm Generic Diagnostic Dump and Reset device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YiesD0vwbAOQGaGK@lpieralisi>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:18:39 +0000
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc:     guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, lenb@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com,
        james.morse@....com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...erecomputing.com, scott@...amperecomputing.com,
        darren@...amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 0/2] ACPI: Arm Generic Diagnostic Dump and
 Reset device

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 02:29:10PM -0800, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:

[...]

> > > Would you prefer this version, which doesn't have platform
> > > device/driver any more?
> > 
> > I thought about that and in order to keep consistency it is better to
> > keep the platform device model, so please resend the latest version
> > platform device based and I will ACK it (hopefully it is not too late
> > for v5.18).
> 
> Sure, I can do that. Just one question, do you still prefer agdi_init()
> getting called from acpi_init() or via device_initcall()?

In acpi_init(), thanks.

Lorenzo