[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220308200614.gyhp657bdq3rxapl@treble>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:06:14 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/45] x86: Kernel IBT
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:30:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hopefully last posting...
>
> Since last time:
>
> - updated the ftrace_location() patch (naveen, rostedt)
> - added a few comments and clarifications (bpetkov)
> - disable jump-tables (joao)
> - verified clang-14-rc2 works
> - fixed a whole bunch of objtool unreachable insn issue
> - picked up a few more tags
>
> Patches go on top of tip/master + arm64/for-next/linkage. Also available here:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/wip.ibt
<applause> Nice work!!! kernel shadow stacks next? ;-)
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
As talked about on IRC there are still a few outstanding issues, that
I'm fine with fixing after the merge window during the upcoming -next
cycle:
- xen hypercall page functions need 'ret' - (I think you already fixed)
- why don't unreachables need to fill up the entire sym hole?
- get rid of the 'c_file' hack
- improve cmdline option intuitive-ness
- properly integrate the retpoline "demotion" with the new Spectre BHI
related patches - probably still needs more discussion - for example
we might instead want to disable IBT and warn
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists