lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca174698-3790-7ed8-fbaf-674d547d4b76@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:34:22 -0500
From:   Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, luto@...capital.net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com,
        Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: Fix setup_indirect support

On 2/25/22 16:17, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Ross Philipson wrote:
>> The setup_indirect support for x86 setup_data was added in November
>> of 2019. Several issues were found in the implementation and these
>> two patches were created to address those issues.
>>
>> These patches were originally posted as part of the larger TrenchBoot
>> patch set but are now being posted separately since they can be merged
>> independently of the TrenchBoot work.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>  - Add checks and failure modes for when early_memremap and memremap
>>    fail.
>>  - Fix variable declarations to use reverse fir tree format.
>>  - Use local indirect variable and remove all the inline casts.
>>  - Misc. fixes to the commit messages.
>>
>> Ross Philipson (2):
>>   x86/boot: Fix memremap of setup_indirect structures
>>   x86/boot: Add setup_indirect support in early_memremap_is_setup_data
> 
> For both Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>...
> 
> Daniel

Borislav,

Sorry to bug you. I am going on vacation starting next week and I just
wanted to get an idea if v2 looks good for merging in to you? If not I
could probably get a v3 out before I leave.

Thank you,
Ross Philipson

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ