[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c494fa10-e973-c137-b637-66bde327611c@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:00:35 -0600
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
ardb@...nel.org, nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename
args to unwind()
On 3/7/22 11:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:51:38AM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
>> Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown,
>>
>> Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can?
>>
>
> Please don't send content free pings. As far as I remember I'd reviewed
> or was expecting changes based on review or dependent patches for
> everything that you'd sent.
>
Indeed you did! Many thanks!
It is just that patch 11 that defines "select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE" did not receive any comments from you (unless I missed a comment that came from you. That is entirely possible. If I missed it, my bad). Since you suggested that change, I just wanted to make sure that that patch looks OK to you.
>> Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both. So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones?
>
> That's more a question for Catalin and Will. If myself and Mark have
> reviewed patches then we're saying we think those patches are good to
> go.
Got it!
Thanks!
Madhavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists