lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaxuYt+0j8z71y9z1+i0a=Q0hS0mb4cEKKzbiq3QAyNaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 21:52:00 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
        Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/28] libbpf: add HID program type and API

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:38 PM Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 7, 2022, at 5:30 PM, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 9:31 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> > <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> HID-bpf program type are needing a new SEC.
> >> To bind a hid-bpf program, we can rely on bpf_program__attach_fd()
> >> so export a new function to the API.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> changes in v2:
> >> - split the series by bpf/libbpf/hid/selftests and samples
> >> ---
> >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c   | 7 +++++++
> >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h   | 2 ++
> >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 1 +
> >> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >> index 81bf01d67671..356bbd3ad2c7 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> >> @@ -8680,6 +8680,7 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
> >>        SEC_DEF("cgroup/setsockopt",    CGROUP_SOCKOPT, BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
> >>        SEC_DEF("struct_ops+",          STRUCT_OPS, 0, SEC_NONE),
> >>        SEC_DEF("sk_lookup",            SK_LOOKUP, BPF_SK_LOOKUP, SEC_ATTACHABLE | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
> >> +       SEC_DEF("hid/device_event",     HID, BPF_HID_DEVICE_EVENT, SEC_ATTACHABLE_OPT | SEC_SLOPPY_PFX),
> >
> > no SEC_SLOPPY_PFX for any new program type, please
> >
> >
> >> };
> >>
> >> #define MAX_TYPE_NAME_SIZE 32
> >> @@ -10659,6 +10660,12 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog, long cookie)
> >>        return bpf_program__attach_iter(prog, NULL);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +struct bpf_link *
> >> +bpf_program__attach_hid(const struct bpf_program *prog, int hid_fd)
> >> +{
> >> +       return bpf_program__attach_fd(prog, hid_fd, 0, "hid");
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach(const struct bpf_program *prog)
> >> {
> >>        if (!prog->sec_def || !prog->sec_def->attach_fn)
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> >> index c8d8daad212e..f677ac0a9ede 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> >> @@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ struct bpf_iter_attach_opts {
> >> LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
> >> bpf_program__attach_iter(const struct bpf_program *prog,
> >>                         const struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts);
> >> +LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
> >> +bpf_program__attach_hid(const struct bpf_program *prog, int hid_fd);
> >>
> >> /*
> >>  * Libbpf allows callers to adjust BPF programs before being loaded
> >> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> >> index 47e70c9058d9..fdc6fa743953 100644
> >> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> >> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> >> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ LIBBPF_0.6.0 {
> >> LIBBPF_0.7.0 {
> >>        global:
> >>                bpf_btf_load;
> >> +               bpf_program__attach_hid;
> >
> > should go into 0.8.0
>
> Ah, I missed this one.
>
> btw, bpf_xdp_attach and buddies should also go into 0.8.0, no?

not really, they were released in libbpf v0.7, it's just any new
incoming API that should go into 0.8.0

>
> >
> >>                bpf_program__expected_attach_type;
> >>                bpf_program__log_buf;
> >>                bpf_program__log_level;
> >> --
> >> 2.35.1
> >>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ