linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 2/2] remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220308064821.2154-2-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Date:   Tue,  8 Mar 2022 14:48:21 +0800
From:   "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com
Cc:     linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peng.fan@....com
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>

Current logic only support main processor to stop/start the remote
processor after rproc crash. However to SoC, such as i.MX8QM/QXP, the
remote processor could do attach recovery after crash and trigger watchdog
reboot. It does not need main processor to load image, or stop/start M4
core.

Introduce two functions: rproc_attach_recovery, rproc_firmware_recovery
for the two cases. Firmware recovery is as before, let main processor to
help recovery, while attach recovery is recover itself withou help.
To attach recovery, we only do detach and attach.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---

V2:
 use rproc_has_feature in patch 1/2

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 69f51acf235e..366fad475898 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1887,6 +1887,50 @@ static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rproc_attach_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
+	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (atomic_inc_return(&rproc->power) > 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	return rproc_attach(rproc);
+}
+
+static int rproc_firmware_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	const struct firmware *firmware_p;
+	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* generate coredump */
+	rproc->ops->coredump(rproc);
+
+	/* load firmware */
+	ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* boot the remote processor up again */
+	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
+
+	release_firmware(firmware_p);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * rproc_trigger_recovery() - recover a remoteproc
  * @rproc: the remote processor
@@ -1901,7 +1945,6 @@ static int __rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
  */
 int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
-	const struct firmware *firmware_p;
 	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1915,24 +1958,10 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	dev_err(dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name);
 
-	ret = rproc_stop(rproc, true);
-	if (ret)
-		goto unlock_mutex;
-
-	/* generate coredump */
-	rproc->ops->coredump(rproc);
-
-	/* load firmware */
-	ret = request_firmware(&firmware_p, rproc->firmware, dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(dev, "request_firmware failed: %d\n", ret);
-		goto unlock_mutex;
-	}
-
-	/* boot the remote processor up again */
-	ret = rproc_start(rproc, firmware_p);
-
-	release_firmware(firmware_p);
+	if (rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_ATTACH_RECOVERY))
+		ret = rproc_attach_recovery(rproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_firmware_recovery(rproc);
 
 unlock_mutex:
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
-- 
2.30.0