[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220308065905.GB24269@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:59:05 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@...y.sk>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Tim Waugh <tim@...erelk.net>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] pata_parport: add core driver (PARIDE
replacement)
> +
> +static void pata_parport_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pi_adapter *pi = container_of(dev, struct pi_adapter, dev);
> +
> + kfree(pi);
> +}
>
> +void pata_parport_bus_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + /* nothing to do here but required to avoid warning on device removal */
> +}
> +
> +static struct bus_type pata_parport_bus_type = {
> + .name = DRV_NAME,
> +};
> +
> +static struct device pata_parport_bus = {
> + .init_name = DRV_NAME,
> + .release = pata_parport_bus_release,
> +};
Hmm, wouldn't it make sense to let the libata device hang off the device
in struct pardevice?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists