[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <61B4B869-1B0B-4FE9-9AEE-712A3F50EDA6@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:12:59 +0100
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bfq: default slice_idle to 0 for SSD
> Il giorno 8 mar 2022, alle ore 01:02, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com> ha scritto:
>
> This improves performance on SSDs dramatically, and was default for CFQ
>
Ho,
unfortunately it is unacceptable, because it simply switches BFQ off with sync I/O.
Thanks,
Paolo
> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...gle.com>
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 36a66e97e3c2..f3196036940c 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -7105,7 +7105,8 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
> bfqd->bfq_fifo_expire[1] = bfq_fifo_expire[1];
> bfqd->bfq_back_max = bfq_back_max;
> bfqd->bfq_back_penalty = bfq_back_penalty;
> - bfqd->bfq_slice_idle = bfq_slice_idle;
> + /* Default to no idling for SSDs */
> + bfqd->bfq_slice_idle = blk_queue_nonrot(q) ? 0 : bfq_slice_idle;
> bfqd->bfq_timeout = bfq_timeout;
>
> bfqd->bfq_large_burst_thresh = 8;
> --
> 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists