| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <PH0PR03MB67867223806C29FF1DF90E6499099@PH0PR03MB6786.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:25:07 +0000
From: "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] device property: Allow error pointer to be passed
to fwnode APIs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 9:30 PM
> To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>; Rafael J.
> Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>; Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>; Sakari Ailus
> <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael@...nel.org>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; Sa, Nuno
> <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] device property: Allow error pointer to be
> passed to fwnode APIs
>
> [External]
>
> Some of the fwnode APIs might return an error pointer instead of
> NULL
> or valid fwnode handle. The result of such API call may be considered
> optional and hence the test for it is usually done in a form of
>
> fwnode = fwnode_find_reference(...);
> if (IS_ERR(fwnode))
> ...error handling...
>
> Nevertheless the resulting fwnode may have bumped the reference
> count
> and hence caller of the above API is obliged to call
> fwnode_handle_put().
> Since fwnode may be not valid either as NULL or error pointer the
> check
> has to be performed there. This approach uglifies the code and adds
> a point of making a mistake, i.e. forgetting about error point case.
>
> To prevent this, allow an error pointer to be passed to the fwnode
> APIs.
>
> Fixes: 83b34afb6b79 ("device property: Introduce
> fwnode_find_reference()")
> Reported-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> ---
>
> v3: dropped test of secondary fwnode (Nuno), added tag (Nuno),
> amended commit message
> v2: adjusted the entire fwnode API (Sakari)
>
> Nuno, can you re-test this with the ltc2983 series to be sure it is still
> okay?
Still works!
> drivers/base/property.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> -----
> include/linux/fwnode.h | 10 +++---
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index c0e94cce9c29..635a0e556a4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/fwnode.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> @@ -47,12 +48,14 @@ bool fwnode_property_present(const struct
> fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> {
> bool ret;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return false;
> +
> ret = fwnode_call_bool_op(fwnode, property_present,
> propname);
> - if (ret == false && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode) &&
> - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary))
> - ret = fwnode_call_bool_op(fwnode->secondary,
> property_present,
> - propname);
> - return ret;
> + if (ret == true)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return fwnode_call_bool_op(fwnode->secondary,
> property_present, propname);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_present);
>
> @@ -232,15 +235,16 @@ static int
> fwnode_property_read_int_array(const struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode,
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode, property_read_int_array,
> propname,
> elem_size, val, nval);
> - if (ret == -EINVAL && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode) &&
> - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary))
> - ret = fwnode_call_int_op(
> - fwnode->secondary, property_read_int_array,
> propname,
> - elem_size, val, nval);
> + if (ret != -EINVAL)
> + return ret;
>
> - return ret;
> + return fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode->secondary,
> property_read_int_array, propname,
> + elem_size, val, nval);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -371,14 +375,16 @@ int
> fwnode_property_read_string_array(const struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode,
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode,
> property_read_string_array, propname,
> val, nval);
> - if (ret == -EINVAL && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode) &&
> - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary))
> - ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode->secondary,
> - property_read_string_array,
> propname,
> - val, nval);
> - return ret;
> + if (ret != -EINVAL)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode->secondary,
> property_read_string_array, propname,
> + val, nval);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_read_string_array);
>
> @@ -480,15 +486,16 @@ int
> fwnode_property_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode,
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode, get_reference_args, prop,
> nargs_prop,
> nargs, index, args);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + return ret;
>
> - if (ret < 0 && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode) &&
> - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary))
> - ret = fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode->secondary,
> get_reference_args,
> - prop, nargs_prop, nargs, index,
> args);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return fwnode_call_int_op(fwnode->secondary,
> get_reference_args, prop, nargs_prop,
> + nargs, index, args);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_get_reference_args);
>
> @@ -698,7 +705,7 @@ fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(const
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> {
> struct fwnode_handle *next_child = child;
>
> - if (!fwnode)
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> return NULL;
>
> do {
> @@ -722,16 +729,16 @@ struct fwnode_handle
> *device_get_next_child_node(struct device *dev,
> const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
> struct fwnode_handle *next;
>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return NULL;
> +
> /* Try to find a child in primary fwnode */
> next = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, child);
> if (next)
> return next;
>
> /* When no more children in primary, continue with secondary
> */
> - if (fwnode && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode->secondary))
> - next = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode-
> >secondary, child);
> -
> - return next;
> + return fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode->secondary,
> child);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_next_child_node);
>
> @@ -798,6 +805,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_handle_put);
> */
> bool fwnode_device_is_available(const struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode)
> {
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return false;
> +
> if (!fwnode_has_op(fwnode, device_is_available))
> return true;
>
> @@ -988,14 +998,14 @@ fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(const
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> parent = fwnode_graph_get_port_parent(prev);
> else
> parent = fwnode;
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(parent))
> + return NULL;
>
> ep = fwnode_call_ptr_op(parent, graph_get_next_endpoint,
> prev);
> + if (ep)
> + return ep;
I might be missing something but before the check being done was
'if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ep)'. Is there anyway for ep to be an error
pointer? Looking at OF, It seems that only NULL or a valid pointer
is being returned. Did not looked at others implementations of
though...
- Nuno Sá
Powered by blists - more mailing lists