linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: don't have to lock page anymore when splitting PMD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrHWjDk5PHJPep=KVHmHtktJana9FtAWZoT196Rg9utJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:59:27 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: don't have to lock page anymore when splitting PMD

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 4:50 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:03:12 -0800 Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:43 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > @@ -2133,8 +2133,6 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_str
> > >  {
> > >         spinlock_t *ptl;
> > >         struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> > > -       bool do_unlock_folio = false;
> > > -       pmd_t _pmd;
> > >
> > >         mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma, vma->vm_mm,
> > >                                 address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK,
> > > @@ -2153,42 +2151,14 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_str
> > >                         goto out;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -repeat:
> > >         if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
> > > -               if (!folio) {
> > > +               if (!folio)
> > >                         folio = page_folio(pmd_page(*pmd));
> >
> > We could remove the "if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd))" section since folio is
> > actually not used afterward at all.
>
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> > With the above if removed, this could be changed to:
> >
> > if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> >             is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd))
> >                 __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
> >
>
> OK, looks sane.  Can someone please test all this?

Build test? I had the exact same change in my tree, it worked for me.


>
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-huge_memory-remove-stale-locking-logic-from-__split_huge_pmd-fix
> +++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2151,12 +2151,10 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_str
>                         goto out;
>         }
>
> -       if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
> -               if (!folio)
> -                       folio = page_folio(pmd_page(*pmd));
> -       } else if (!(pmd_devmap(*pmd) || is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)))
> -               goto out;
> -       __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
> +       if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> +           is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)))
> +               __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
> +
>  out:
>         spin_unlock(ptl);
>         /*
> _
>