linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] samples/bpf: fix broken bpf programs due to function inlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YiczXPnQakMwNEbX@baaz>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:13:40 +0530
From:   Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] samples/bpf: fix broken bpf programs due to
 function inlining

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:11:36PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 4:15 AM Muhammad Falak R Wani
> <falakreyaz@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > commit: "be6bfe36db17 block: inline hot paths of blk_account_io_*()"
> > inlines the function `blk_account_io_done`. As a result we can't attach a
> > kprobe to the function anymore. Use `__blk_account_io_done` instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c | 2 +-
> >  samples/bpf/tracex3_kern.c       | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c
> > index c821294e1774..186ac0a79c0a 100644
> > --- a/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c
> > +++ b/samples/bpf/task_fd_query_kern.c
> 
> samples/bpf/task_fd_query_user.c also needs adjusting, no? Have you
> tried running those samples?
Aplologies, I ran the `tracex3` program, but missed to verify `task_fd_query`. Should I send a V2
where I modify only the `tracex3` ?