linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: realview/versatile/ste: Update spi clock name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKrq-NtkPF=p8Qn-_63qE80_0FSQkbY5WxCfJUcrNxJuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:14:09 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: dts: realview/versatile/ste: Update spi clock name

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:54 PM Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com> wrote:
>
> SPI clock for pl022 is "sspclk" and meanwhile few platforms such as
> realview, versatile etc. specify "SSPCLK" as clock name. Even though
> bindings checks don't differentiate between the two names still keep
> same convention throughout i.e sspclk to align with other platforms.

I don't see the point in worrying about this. The binding already
allows both. Why? Because I wrote the schema and checked it against
all the in tree users. The resulting warnings are what should be fixed
in the dts files IMO. What's not warning doesn't need to be fixed.

Rob