[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9aabfe-1179-67c2-98d1-f36e7e698f33@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:59:59 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Raymond Tan <raymond.tan@...el.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] serial: 8250_dwlib: RS485 HW half duplex support
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 02:16:56PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > The SoC also has a pin to select between RS485 and RS232. With a combo
> > transceiver, TCR-based heuristic just runs into the same problems as the
> > version-based one did.
>
> I thought this was about detecting whether hardware-assisted DE assertion
> may be used (versus software-controlled), not about whether to enable
> RS-485 mode. Right?
HW DE assertion only works when RS485 mode is enabled so I don't see how
these questions could be easily decoupled like that. That's assuming with
"software-controlled" you mean RTS(RS232)+em485?
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists