linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: aio: fixed purely styling errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yidf3D2FqavJawp+@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 13:53:32 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Salih MSA <salihmahmoudsahmed@...il.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Salih MSA <salih.msa@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: aio: fixed purely styling errors

On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:22:57AM +0000, Salih MSA wrote:
> Mostly clarified unsigned -> unsigned int.
> Also separated declarations from functionality.

Please don't.  Why did you think this patch would be a good idea?
What could we write somewhere that would have dissuaded you from sending
this patch?