[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrmHS+nPbw1YZj-rE-ECgRr2nD40d-ZbxPvf05o-rmNcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:55:30 -0800
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/hwpoison: set PageHWPoison after taking page lock
in memory_failure_hugetlb()
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:15 AM Naoya Horiguchi
<naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
>
> There is a race condition between memory_failure_hugetlb() and hugetlb
> free/demotion, which causes setting PageHWPoison flag on the wrong page
> (which was a hugetlb when memory_failrue() was called, but was removed
> or demoted when memory_failure_hugetlb() is called). This results in
> killing wrong processes. So set PageHWPoison flag with holding page lock,
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index ac6492e36978..fe25eee8f9d6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1494,24 +1494,11 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> int res;
> unsigned long page_flags;
>
> - if (TestSetPageHWPoison(head)) {
> - pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: already hardware poisoned\n",
> - pfn);
> - res = -EHWPOISON;
> - if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
> - res = kill_accessing_process(current, page_to_pfn(head), flags);
> - return res;
> - }
> -
> - num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> -
> if (!(flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)) {
> res = get_hwpoison_page(p, flags);
I'm not an expert of hugetlb, I may be wrong. I'm wondering how this
could solve the race? Is the below race still possible?
__get_hwpoison_page()
head = compound_head(page)
hugetlb demotion (1G --> 2M)
get_hwpoison_huge_page(head, &hugetlb);
Then the head may point to a 2M page, but the hwpoisoned subpage is
not in that 2M range?
> if (!res) {
> lock_page(head);
> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> - if (TestClearPageHWPoison(head))
> - num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> unlock_page(head);
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> @@ -1544,13 +1531,16 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> page_flags = head->flags;
>
> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> - if (TestClearPageHWPoison(head))
> - num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> put_page(p);
> res = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (TestSetPageHWPoison(head))
And I don't think "head" is still the head you expected if the race
happened. I think we need to re-retrieve the head once the page
refcount is bumped and locked.
> + goto already_hwpoisoned;
> +
> + num_poisoned_pages_inc();
> +
> /*
> * TODO: hwpoison for pud-sized hugetlb doesn't work right now, so
> * simply disable it. In order to make it work properly, we need
> @@ -1576,6 +1566,13 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> out:
> unlock_page(head);
> return res;
> +already_hwpoisoned:
> + unlock_page(head);
> + pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: already hardware poisoned\n", pfn);
> + res = -EHWPOISON;
> + if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED)
> + res = kill_accessing_process(current, page_to_pfn(head), flags);
> + return res;
> }
>
> static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists