linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] intel_idle: Add SPR support with AMX INIT-state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <35279bb7-e986-9c90-3751-4758fab2f2e9@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:44:25 -0800
From:   "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] intel_idle: Add SPR support with AMX INIT-state

On 11/5/2021 10:26 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05 2021 at 16:03, Bae, Chang Seok wrote:
> 
> My bad. I should have read the cover letter before complaining.
> 
>> I think PATCH3 is better. Maybe PATCH4 should not be sent together to avoid
>> such confusion.
> 
> Yes. patch 3 is way better than patch 4.

At the time of this post, it was clueless whether this TILERELEASE need 
is architectural or implementation-specific. But the latter is the case 
as it turns out. So PATCH4 only appears in V2 here -- 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220309223431.26560-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com/

Thanks,
Chang