[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03e87e5c-0345-5919-9a33-0bdf50285d8b@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:40:42 +0530
From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@....com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 5/9] KVM: SVM: Implement demand page pinning
On 3/9/2022 3:23 AM, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> Use the memslot metadata to store the pinned data along with the pfns.
>> This improves the SEV guest startup time from O(n) to a constant by
>> deferring guest page pinning until the pages are used to satisfy
>> nested page faults. The page reference will be dropped in the memslot
>> free path or deallocation path.
>>
>> Reuse enc_region structure definition as pinned_region to maintain
>> pages that are pinned outside of MMU demand pinning. Remove rest of
>> the code which did upfront pinning, as they are no longer needed in
>> view of the demand pinning support.
>
> I don't quite understand why we still need the enc_region. I have
> several concerns. Details below.
With patch 9 the enc_region is used only for memory that was pinned before
the vcpu is online (i.e. mmu is not yet usable)
>>
>> Retain svm_register_enc_region() and svm_unregister_enc_region() with
>> required checks for resource limit.
>>
>> Guest boot time comparison
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>> | Guest Memory | baseline | Demand Pinning |
>> | Size (GB) | (secs) | (secs) |
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>> | 4 | 6.16 | 5.71 |
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>> | 16 | 7.38 | 5.91 |
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>> | 64 | 12.17 | 6.16 |
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>> | 128 | 18.20 | 6.50 |
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>> | 192 | 24.56 | 6.80 |
>> +---------------+----------------+-------------------+
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 6 +-
>> 3 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
>> index bd7572517c99..d0514975555d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int nr_asids;
>> static unsigned long *sev_asid_bitmap;
>> static unsigned long *sev_reclaim_asid_bitmap;
>>
>> -struct enc_region {
>> +struct pinned_region {
>> struct list_head list;
>> unsigned long npages;
>> struct page **pages;
>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int sev_guest_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> if (ret)
>> goto e_free;
>>
>> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sev->regions_list);
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sev->pinned_regions_list);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> @@ -378,16 +378,34 @@ static int sev_launch_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool rlimit_memlock_exceeds(unsigned long locked, unsigned long npages)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + unsigned long lock_req;
>> +
>> + lock_req = locked + npages;
>> + return (lock_req > lock_limit) && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned long get_npages(unsigned long uaddr, unsigned long ulen)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long first, last;
>> +
>> + /* Calculate number of pages. */
>> + first = (uaddr & PAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + last = ((uaddr + ulen - 1) & PAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + return last - first + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct page **sev_pin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long uaddr,
>> unsigned long ulen, unsigned long *n,
>> int write)
>> {
>> struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> + struct pinned_region *region;
>> unsigned long npages, size;
>> int npinned;
>> - unsigned long locked, lock_limit;
>> struct page **pages;
>> - unsigned long first, last;
>> int ret;
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->lock);
>> @@ -395,15 +413,12 @@ static struct page **sev_pin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long uaddr,
>> if (ulen == 0 || uaddr + ulen < uaddr)
>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>
>> - /* Calculate number of pages. */
>> - first = (uaddr & PAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - last = ((uaddr + ulen - 1) & PAGE_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - npages = (last - first + 1);
>> + npages = get_npages(uaddr, ulen);
>>
>> - locked = sev->pages_locked + npages;
>> - lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - if (locked > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
>> - pr_err("SEV: %lu locked pages exceed the lock limit of %lu.\n", locked, lock_limit);
>> + if (rlimit_memlock_exceeds(sev->pages_to_lock, npages)) {
>> + pr_err("SEV: %lu locked pages exceed the lock limit of %lu.\n",
>> + sev->pages_to_lock + npages,
>> + (rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -429,7 +444,19 @@ static struct page **sev_pin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long uaddr,
>> }
>>
>> *n = npages;
>> - sev->pages_locked = locked;
>> + sev->pages_to_lock += npages;
>> +
>> + /* Maintain region list that is pinned to be unpinned in vm destroy path */
>> + region = kzalloc(sizeof(*region), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> + if (!region) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + region->uaddr = uaddr;
>> + region->size = ulen;
>> + region->pages = pages;
>> + region->npages = npages;
>> + list_add_tail(®ion->list, &sev->pinned_regions_list);
>
> Hmm. I see a duplication of the metadata. We already store the pfns in
> memslot. But now we also do it in regions. Is this one used for
> migration purpose?
We are not duplicating, the enc_region holds regions that are pinned other
than svm_register_enc_region(). Later patches add infrastructure to directly
fault-in those pages which will use memslot->pfns.
>
> I might miss some of the context here.
More context here:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/CAMkAt6p1-82LTRNB3pkPRwYh=wGpreUN=jcUeBj_dZt8ss9w0Q@mail.gmail.com/
> But we may still have to support
> the user-level memory pinning API as legacy case. Instead of duplicating
> the storage, can we change the region list to the list of memslot->pfns
> instead (Or using the struct **pages in memslot instead of pfns)? This
> way APIs could still work but we don't need extra storage burden.
Right, patch 6 and 9 will achieve this using the memslot->pfns when the MMU
is active. We still need to maintain this enc_region if the user tries to pin
memory before MMU is active(i.e. vcpu is online). In my testing, I havent
seen enc_region being used, but added to make sure we do not break any userspace.
> Anyway, I think it might be essentially needed to unify them together,
> Otherwise, not only the metadata size is quite large, but also it is
> confusing to have parallel data structures doing the same thing.
>>
>> return pages;
>>
>> @@ -441,14 +468,43 @@ static struct page **sev_pin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long uaddr,
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> }
>>
>> -static void sev_unpin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, struct page **pages,
>> - unsigned long npages)
>> +static void __sev_unpin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, struct page **pages,
>> + unsigned long npages)
>> {
>> struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>>
>> unpin_user_pages(pages, npages);
>> kvfree(pages);
>> - sev->pages_locked -= npages;
>> + sev->pages_to_lock -= npages;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct pinned_region *find_pinned_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>> + struct page **pages,
>> + unsigned long n)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> + struct list_head *head = &sev->pinned_regions_list;
>> + struct pinned_region *i;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(i, head, list) {
>> + if (i->pages == pages && i->npages == n)
>> + return i;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sev_unpin_memory(struct kvm *kvm, struct page **pages,
>> + unsigned long npages)
>> +{
>> + struct pinned_region *region;
>> +
>> + region = find_pinned_region(kvm, pages, npages);
>> + __sev_unpin_memory(kvm, pages, npages);
>> + if (region) {
>> + list_del(®ion->list);
>> + kfree(region);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static void sev_clflush_pages(struct page *pages[], unsigned long npages)
>> @@ -551,8 +607,9 @@ static int sev_launch_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> set_page_dirty_lock(inpages[i]);
>> mark_page_accessed(inpages[i]);
>> }
>> - /* unlock the user pages */
>> - sev_unpin_memory(kvm, inpages, npages);
>> + /* unlock the user pages on error */
>> + if (ret)
>> + sev_unpin_memory(kvm, inpages, npages);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1059,7 +1116,8 @@ static int sev_launch_secret(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> set_page_dirty_lock(pages[i]);
>> mark_page_accessed(pages[i]);
>> }
>> - sev_unpin_memory(kvm, pages, n);
>> + if (ret)
>> + sev_unpin_memory(kvm, pages, n);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1338,7 +1396,8 @@ static int sev_send_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> e_free_hdr:
>> kfree(hdr);
>> e_unpin:
>> - sev_unpin_memory(kvm, guest_page, n);
>> + if (ret)
>> + sev_unpin_memory(kvm, guest_page, n);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -1508,7 +1567,8 @@ static int sev_receive_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> ret = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_RECEIVE_UPDATE_DATA, &data,
>> &argp->error);
>>
>> - sev_unpin_memory(kvm, guest_page, n);
>> + if (ret)
>> + sev_unpin_memory(kvm, guest_page, n);
>>
>> e_free_trans:
>> kfree(trans);
>> @@ -1629,16 +1689,17 @@ static void sev_migrate_from(struct kvm_sev_info *dst,
>> dst->active = true;
>> dst->asid = src->asid;
>> dst->handle = src->handle;
>> - dst->pages_locked = src->pages_locked;
>> + dst->pages_to_lock = src->pages_to_lock;
>> dst->enc_context_owner = src->enc_context_owner;
>>
>> src->asid = 0;
>> src->active = false;
>> src->handle = 0;
>> - src->pages_locked = 0;
>> + src->pages_to_lock = 0;
>> src->enc_context_owner = NULL;
>>
>> - list_cut_before(&dst->regions_list, &src->regions_list, &src->regions_list);
>> + list_cut_before(&dst->pinned_regions_list, &src->pinned_regions_list,
>> + &src->pinned_regions_list);
>> }
>>
>> static int sev_es_migrate_from(struct kvm *dst, struct kvm *src)
>> @@ -1862,8 +1923,7 @@ int svm_register_enc_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_enc_region *range)
>> {
>> struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> - struct enc_region *region;
>> - int ret = 0;
>> + unsigned long npages;
>>
>> if (!sev_guest(kvm))
>> return -ENOTTY;
>> @@ -1875,101 +1935,35 @@ int svm_register_enc_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>> if (range->addr > ULONG_MAX || range->size > ULONG_MAX)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - region = kzalloc(sizeof(*region), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> - if (!region)
>> + npages = get_npages(range->addr, range->size);
>> + if (rlimit_memlock_exceeds(sev->pages_to_lock, npages)) {
>> + pr_err("SEV: %lu locked pages exceed the lock limit of %lu.\n",
>> + sev->pages_to_lock + npages,
>> + (rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> - region->pages = sev_pin_memory(kvm, range->addr, range->size, ®ion->npages, 1);
>> - if (IS_ERR(region->pages)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(region->pages);
>> - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> - goto e_free;
>> }
>> + sev->pages_to_lock += npages;
>>
>> - region->uaddr = range->addr;
>> - region->size = range->size;
>> -
>> - list_add_tail(®ion->list, &sev->regions_list);
>> - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * The guest may change the memory encryption attribute from C=0 -> C=1
>> - * or vice versa for this memory range. Lets make sure caches are
>> - * flushed to ensure that guest data gets written into memory with
>> - * correct C-bit.
>> - */
>> - sev_clflush_pages(region->pages, region->npages);
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> -e_free:
>> - kfree(region);
>> - return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct enc_region *
>> -find_enc_region(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enc_region *range)
>> -{
>> - struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> - struct list_head *head = &sev->regions_list;
>> - struct enc_region *i;
>> -
>> - list_for_each_entry(i, head, list) {
>> - if (i->uaddr == range->addr &&
>> - i->size == range->size)
>> - return i;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return NULL;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void __unregister_enc_region_locked(struct kvm *kvm,
>> - struct enc_region *region)
>> -{
>> - sev_unpin_memory(kvm, region->pages, region->npages);
>> - list_del(®ion->list);
>> - kfree(region);
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> int svm_unregister_enc_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_enc_region *range)
>> {
>> - struct enc_region *region;
>> - int ret;
>> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> + unsigned long npages;
>>
>> /* If kvm is mirroring encryption context it isn't responsible for it */
>> if (is_mirroring_enc_context(kvm))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>> -
>> - if (!sev_guest(kvm)) {
>> - ret = -ENOTTY;
>> - goto failed;
>> - }
>> -
>> - region = find_enc_region(kvm, range);
>> - if (!region) {
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - goto failed;
>> - }
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Ensure that all guest tagged cache entries are flushed before
>> - * releasing the pages back to the system for use. CLFLUSH will
>> - * not do this, so issue a WBINVD.
>> - */
>> - wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
>> + if (!sev_guest(kvm))
>> + return -ENOTTY;
>>
>> - __unregister_enc_region_locked(kvm, region);
>> + npages = get_npages(range->addr, range->size);
>> + sev->pages_to_lock -= npages;
>>
>> - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> return 0;
>> -
>> -failed:
>> - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>> - return ret;
>> }
>>
>> int svm_vm_copy_asid_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
>> @@ -2018,7 +2012,7 @@ int svm_vm_copy_asid_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
>> mirror_sev->fd = source_sev->fd;
>> mirror_sev->es_active = source_sev->es_active;
>> mirror_sev->handle = source_sev->handle;
>> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mirror_sev->regions_list);
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mirror_sev->pinned_regions_list);
>> ret = 0;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2038,8 +2032,9 @@ int svm_vm_copy_asid_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
>> void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>> {
>> struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> - struct list_head *head = &sev->regions_list;
>> + struct list_head *head = &sev->pinned_regions_list;
>> struct list_head *pos, *q;
>> + struct pinned_region *region;
>>
>> WARN_ON(sev->num_mirrored_vms);
>>
>> @@ -2072,8 +2067,14 @@ void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>> */
>> if (!list_empty(head)) {
>> list_for_each_safe(pos, q, head) {
>> - __unregister_enc_region_locked(kvm,
>> - list_entry(pos, struct enc_region, list));
>> + /*
>> + * Unpin the memory that were pinned outside of MMU
>> + * demand pinning
>> + */
>> + region = list_entry(pos, struct pinned_region, list);
>> + __sev_unpin_memory(kvm, region->pages, region->npages);
>> + list_del(®ion->list);
>> + kfree(region);
>> cond_resched();
>> }
>> }
> So the guest memory has already been unpinned in sev_free_memslot().
> Why doing it again at here?
Guest memory that was demand pinned got freed using sev_free_memslot(). Regions that were
statically pinned for e.g. SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA need to be freed here. This too will be
demand pinned in patch 9.
>
>> @@ -2951,13 +2952,96 @@ void sev_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector)
>> ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, 1);
>> }
>>
>> +bool sev_pin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>> + kvm_pfn_t pfn, hva_t hva, bool write, enum pg_level level)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int npages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
>> + unsigned int flags = FOLL_LONGTERM, npinned;
>> + struct kvm_arch_memory_slot *aslot;
>> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> + gfn_t gfn_start, rel_gfn;
>> + struct page *page[1];
>> + kvm_pfn_t old_pfn;
>> +
>> + if (!sev_guest(kvm))
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!memslot->arch.pfns))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (KVM_BUG_ON(level > PG_LEVEL_1G, kvm))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + hva = ALIGN_DOWN(hva, npages << PAGE_SHIFT);
>> + flags |= write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_arch_lock);
>> + gfn_start = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva, memslot);
>> + rel_gfn = gfn_start - memslot->base_gfn;
>> + aslot = &memslot->arch;
>> + if (test_bit(rel_gfn, aslot->pinned_bitmap)) {
>> + old_pfn = aslot->pfns[rel_gfn];
>> + if (old_pfn == pfn)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + /* Flush the cache before releasing the page to the system */
>> + sev_flush_guest_memory(to_svm(vcpu), __va(old_pfn),
>> + npages * PAGE_SIZE);
>> + unpin_user_page(pfn_to_page(old_pfn));
>> + }
>> + /* Pin the page, KVM doesn't yet support page migration. */
>> + npinned = pin_user_pages_fast(hva, 1, flags, page);
>> + KVM_BUG(npinned != 1, kvm, "SEV: Pinning failed\n");
>> + KVM_BUG(pfn != page_to_pfn(page[0]), kvm, "SEV: pfn mismatch\n");
>> +
>> + if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SME_COHERENT))
>> + clflush_cache_range(__va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), npages * PAGE_SIZE);
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(rel_gfn >= memslot->npages);
>> + aslot->pfns[rel_gfn] = pfn;
>> + set_bit(rel_gfn, aslot->pinned_bitmap);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_arch_lock);
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> void sev_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>> {
>> struct kvm_arch_memory_slot *aslot = &slot->arch;
>> + kvm_pfn_t *pfns;
>> + gfn_t gfn;
>> + int i;
>>
>> if (!sev_guest(kvm))
>> return;
>>
>> + if (!aslot->pinned_bitmap || !slot->arch.pfns)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + pfns = aslot->pfns;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Ensure that all guest tagged cache entries are flushed before
>> + * releasing the pages back to the system for use. CLFLUSH will
>> + * not do this, so issue a WBINVD.
>> + */
>> + wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
>
> This is a heavy-weight operation and is essentially only needed at most
> once per VM shutdown. So, better using smaller hammer in the following
> code. Or, alternatively, maybe passing a boolean from caller to avoid
> flushing if true.
Or maybe I can do this in sev_vm_destroy() patch?
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Iterate the memslot to find the pinned pfn using the bitmap and drop
>> + * the pfn stored.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0, gfn = slot->base_gfn; i < slot->npages; i++, gfn++) {
>> + if (test_and_clear_bit(i, aslot->pinned_bitmap)) {
>> + if (WARN_ON(!pfns[i]))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + unpin_user_page(pfn_to_page(pfns[i]));
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> if (aslot->pinned_bitmap) {
>> kvfree(aslot->pinned_bitmap);
>> aslot->pinned_bitmap = NULL;
>> @@ -2992,6 +3076,8 @@ int sev_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> aslot->pinned_bitmap = kvzalloc(pinned_bytes, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
>> + new->flags |= KVM_MEMSLOT_ENCRYPTED;
>> +
>> if (!aslot->pinned_bitmap) {
>> kvfree(aslot->pfns);
>> aslot->pfns = NULL;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> index ec06421cb532..463a90ed6f83 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> @@ -4661,6 +4661,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
>>
>> .alloc_memslot_metadata = sev_alloc_memslot_metadata,
>> .free_memslot = sev_free_memslot,
>> + .pin_pfn = sev_pin_pfn,
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
>> index f00364020d7e..2f38e793ead0 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
>> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ struct kvm_sev_info {
>> unsigned int asid; /* ASID used for this guest */
>> unsigned int handle; /* SEV firmware handle */
>> int fd; /* SEV device fd */
>> - unsigned long pages_locked; /* Number of pages locked */
>> - struct list_head regions_list; /* List of registered regions */
>> + unsigned long pages_to_lock; /* Number of page that can be locked */
>> + struct list_head pinned_regions_list; /* List of pinned regions */
>> u64 ap_jump_table; /* SEV-ES AP Jump Table address */
>> struct kvm *enc_context_owner; /* Owner of copied encryption context */
>> unsigned long num_mirrored_vms; /* Number of VMs sharing this ASID */
>> @@ -621,5 +621,7 @@ int sev_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *new);
>> void sev_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
>> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
>> +bool sev_pin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>> + kvm_pfn_t pfn, hva_t hva, bool write, enum pg_level level);
>>
>> #endif
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>
Thanks for the review.
Regards
Nikunj
Powered by blists - more mailing lists