[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220309065718.e4k2el2mlqn23yh2@treble>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 22:57:18 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/45] x86: Kernel IBT
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 12:06:18PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> As talked about on IRC there are still a few outstanding issues, that
> I'm fine with fixing after the merge window during the upcoming -next
> cycle:
>
> - xen hypercall page functions need 'ret' - (I think you already fixed)
>
> - why don't unreachables need to fill up the entire sym hole?
>
> - get rid of the 'c_file' hack
>
> - improve cmdline option intuitive-ness
>
> - properly integrate the retpoline "demotion" with the new Spectre BHI
> related patches - probably still needs more discussion - for example
> we might instead want to disable IBT and warn
One more:
- Changing objtool should force a vmlinux re-link.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists