[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220309085756.GA18220@axis.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:57:56 +0100
From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
kernel <kernel@...s.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: samsung: Add ARTPEC-8 UART
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:41:45PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:51 AM Vincent Whitchurch
> <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add a compatible for the UART on the ARTPEC-8 SoC.
>
> Yes, the diff says that already. Perhaps some explanation why you are
> adding another vendor SoC to Samsung UART and how the h/w is
> different. I can only guess based on having just gone thru this with
> Apple.
The IP has been customized for the ARTPEC-8 SoC but is closely related
to the variants used on the Exynos chips. I can add this information to
the commit message.
The choice of the vendor prefix is similar to the solution chosen in
this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220125031604.76009-2-alim.akhtar@samsung.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists