[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yihxh3HdEqu3B2w9@unreal>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:21:11 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
CC: <jgg@...dia.com>, <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
<galpress@...zon.com>, <sleybo@...zon.com>,
<liangwenpeng@...wei.com>, <liweihang@...wei.com>,
<mustafa.ismail@...el.com>, <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
<dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
<mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>, <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/9] RDMA: get rid of create_user_ah
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:34:28PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> The two members create_user_ah and create_ah in struct ib_device_ops
> are very similar. we can use create_ah for all case. so get rid of
> create_user_ah.
1. Please read commit message and content of commit 676a80adba01
("RDMA: Remove AH from uverbs_cmd_mask") that added that .create_user_ah()
callback.
2. You should send patches as a series that is threaded and not as
stand-alone patches.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists