[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175b89f0-14a6-2309-041f-69314d9f191a@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:58:54 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dmatlack@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/25] KVM: x86/mmu: split cpu_mode from mmu_role
On 3/8/22 19:55, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> static void shadow_mmu_init_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *context,
>> - const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs,
>> - union kvm_mmu_role new_role)
>> + union kvm_mmu_role cpu_mode,
> Can you give all helpers this treatment (rename "role" => "cpu_mode")? I got
> tripped up a few times reading patches because the ones where it wasn't necessary,
> i.e. where there's only a single kvm_mmu_role paramenter, were left as-is.
>
> I think kvm_calc_shadow_npt_root_page_role() and kvm_calc_shadow_mmu_root_page_role()
> are the only offenders.
These take struct kvm_mmu_role_regs; they *return* union kvm_mmu_role
but that is changed later in the series to the base part only.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists