[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiiF9wfx3V+K1J33@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:48:23 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com>
Cc: Dmitrii Okunev <xaionaro@...com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Xiaoyan Zhang <xiaoyan.zhang@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] platform/x86: Add sysfs interface for Intel TXT
status
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 10:40:03AM +0000, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> (This is an RFC to see if the approach is generally acceptable; unlike
> the previous driver this exposes the information purely as read-only
> status information, so userspace can make an informed decision about the
> system state without having to poke about in /dev/mem. There are still a
> few extra registers I'm trying to dig up information for before a proper
> submission.)
>
> This module provides read-only access to the Intel TXT (Trusted
> Execution Technology) status registers, allowing userspace to determine
> the status of measured boot and whether the dynamic root of trust for
> measurement (DRTM) has been fully enabled.
>
> Tools such as txt-stat from tboot
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/tboot/> can make use of this driver to
> display state rather than relying on access to /dev/mem.
>
> See Documentation/x86/intel_txt.rst for more information about Intel
> TXT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/txt.h | 34 +++++
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/Kconfig | 14 ++
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/txt_sysfs.c | 185 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
No Documentation/ABI/ entry for your new sysfs entry? How can we
evaluate if this is a good api then?
Wait, I don't see any sysfs code in here, are you sure you sent a viable
patch?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists