lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220309111445.86484-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Date:   Wed,  9 Mar 2022 19:14:45 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To:     corbet@....net, hannes@...xchg.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, surenb@...gle.com, ebiggers@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        songmuchun@...edance.com,
        Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>,
        Martin Steigerwald <Martin.Steigerwald@...act.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] psi: report zeroes for CPU full at the system level

Martin find it confusing when look at the /proc/pressure/cpu output,
and found no hint about that CPU "full" line in psi Documentation.

% cat /proc/pressure/cpu
some avg10=0.92 avg60=0.91 avg300=0.73 total=933490489
full avg10=0.22 avg60=0.23 avg300=0.16 total=358783277

The PSI_CPU_FULL state is introduced by commit e7fcd7622823
("psi: Add PSI_CPU_FULL state"), which mainly for cgroup level,
but also counted at the system level as a side effect.

Naturally, the FULL state doesn't exist for the CPU resource at
the system level. These "full" numbers can come from CPU idle
schedule latency. For example, t1 is the time when task wakeup
on an idle CPU, t2 is the time when CPU pick and switch to it.
The delta of (t2 - t1) will be in CPU_FULL state.

Another case all processes can be stalled is when all cgroups
have been throttled at the same time, which unlikely to happen.

Anyway, CPU_FULL metric is meaningless and confusing at the
system level. So this patch will report zeroes for CPU full
at the system level, and update psi Documentation accordingly.

Fixes: e7fcd7622823 ("psi: Add PSI_CPU_FULL state")
Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin.Steigerwald@...act.de>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- update doc about the zeroes in CPU full at the system level.
---
 Documentation/accounting/psi.rst |  9 ++++-----
 kernel/sched/psi.c               | 15 +++++++++------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/accounting/psi.rst b/Documentation/accounting/psi.rst
index 860fe651d645..5e40b3f437f9 100644
--- a/Documentation/accounting/psi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/accounting/psi.rst
@@ -37,11 +37,7 @@ Pressure interface
 Pressure information for each resource is exported through the
 respective file in /proc/pressure/ -- cpu, memory, and io.
 
-The format for CPU is as such::
-
-	some avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
-
-and for memory and IO::
+The format is as such::
 
 	some avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
 	full avg10=0.00 avg60=0.00 avg300=0.00 total=0
@@ -58,6 +54,9 @@ situation from a state where some tasks are stalled but the CPU is
 still doing productive work. As such, time spent in this subset of the
 stall state is tracked separately and exported in the "full" averages.
 
+CPU full is undefined at the system level, but has been reported
+since 5.13, so it is set to zero for backward compatibility.
+
 The ratios (in %) are tracked as recent trends over ten, sixty, and
 three hundred second windows, which gives insight into short term events
 as well as medium and long term trends. The total absolute stall time
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index e14358178849..97fd85c5143c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -1062,14 +1062,17 @@ int psi_show(struct seq_file *m, struct psi_group *group, enum psi_res res)
 	mutex_unlock(&group->avgs_lock);
 
 	for (full = 0; full < 2; full++) {
-		unsigned long avg[3];
-		u64 total;
+		unsigned long avg[3] = { 0, };
+		u64 total = 0;
 		int w;
 
-		for (w = 0; w < 3; w++)
-			avg[w] = group->avg[res * 2 + full][w];
-		total = div_u64(group->total[PSI_AVGS][res * 2 + full],
-				NSEC_PER_USEC);
+		/* CPU FULL is undefined at the system level */
+		if (!(group == &psi_system && res == PSI_CPU && full)) {
+			for (w = 0; w < 3; w++)
+				avg[w] = group->avg[res * 2 + full][w];
+			total = div_u64(group->total[PSI_AVGS][res * 2 + full],
+					NSEC_PER_USEC);
+		}
 
 		seq_printf(m, "%s avg10=%lu.%02lu avg60=%lu.%02lu avg300=%lu.%02lu total=%llu\n",
 			   full ? "full" : "some",
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ