[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiiWduSVDz1yYA9z@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:58:46 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Yongzhi Liu <lyz_cs@....edu.cn>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 012/105] dmaengine: shdma: Fix runtime PM imbalance
on error
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:54:20AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Yongzhi Liu <lyz_cs@....edu.cn>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 455896c53d5b803733ddd84e1bf8a430644439b6 ]
> >
> > pm_runtime_get_() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > when it returns an error code, thus a matching decrement is needed on
> > the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
>
> This patch will break things.
>
> Notice that -ret is ignored (checked 4.4 and 5.10), so we don't
> actually abort/return error; we just printk. We'll do two
> pm_runtime_put's after the "fix".
>
> Please drop from -stable.
>
> It was discussed during AUTOSEL review:
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:25:10 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
> From: 刘永志 <lyz_cs@....edu.cn>
> To: pavel machek <pavel@...x.de>
> Cc: sasha levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.16 24/30] dmaengine: shdma: Fix runtime PM
> imbalance on error
So 5.15 and 5.16 is ok, but older is not?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists