[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7a8d183-fe2b-99b1-9730-eddb040f6d1e@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:51:57 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/client: Use actual bpp when allocating frame
buffers
On 3/7/22 21:52, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When allocating a frame buffer, the number of bits per pixel needed is
> derived from the deprecated drm_format_info.cpp[] field. While this
> works for formats using less than 8 bits per pixel, it does lead to a
> large overallocation.
>
> Reduce memory consumption by using the actual number of bits per pixel
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists