linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to devm_drm_of_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG3jFytLEHbzOHoGSoTk3WSHUBDns64aZWPwUFmhrUrQzncXGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:53:30 +0100
From:   Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
To:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>,
        andrzej.hajda@...el.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        jonas@...boo.se, airlied@...ux.ie, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        narmstrong@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jernej.skrabec@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, maxime@...no.tech
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: switch to devm_drm_of_get_bridge

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 13:12, Kieran Bingham
<kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi José
>
> Quoting Kieran Bingham (2022-03-03 21:59:26)
> > Quoting José Expósito (2022-03-03 18:37:20)
> > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:24:36PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > > > Hi José
> > > >
> > > > Quoting José Expósito (2022-02-28 18:39:54)
> > > > > The function "drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge" has been deprecated in
> > > > > favor of "devm_drm_of_get_bridge".
> > > > >
> > > > > Switch to the new function and reduce boilerplate.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 8 +-------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > > > > index dab8f76618f3..fb8e16ed7e90 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > > > > @@ -1232,15 +1232,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
> > > > >  {
> > > > >         struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(adev->dev.parent);
> > > > >         struct device_node *np = pdata->dev->of_node;
> > > > > -       struct drm_panel *panel;
> > > > >         int ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > -       ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 1, 0, &panel, NULL);
> > > > > -       if (ret)
> > > > > -               return dev_err_probe(&adev->dev, ret,
> > > > > -                                    "could not find any panel node\n");
> > > > > -
> > > > > -       pdata->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(pdata->dev, panel);
> > > > > +       pdata->next_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(pdata->dev, np, 1, 0);
> > > >
> > > > Yikes, I was about to rely on this panel variable to determine if the
> > > > device is a panel or a display port connector. (Well, I am relying on
> > > > it, and patches are hoping to be reposted this week).
> > > >
> > > > Is there expected to be another way to identify if the next connection
> > > > is a panel or a bridge?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > >
> > > Hi Kieran,
> > >
> > > I'm getting started in the DRM subsystem. I couldn't tell if there is a
> > > good way to access the panel pointer... I didn't manage to find it, but
> > > hopefully someone with more experience can point us to a solution.
> > >
> > > Since you mentioned display port, I'm not sure if in your case checking
> > > "pdata->next_bridge->type" could be good enough.
>
> Actually, it is. And I think this is actually cleaner (both here, and in
> the series I'm working on).
>
> > > Anyway, if this patch causes you problems, please go ahead and ignore it.
> > > I'm sure the series you are working on are more important than removing
> > > a deprecated function :)
> >
> > If it's deprecated, I don't want to block it's removal. Hopefully I can
> > resume my work on this tomorrow so I can check to see what I can parse.
> > Thanks for the lead on the bridge type, I'm sure I've seen that around
> > too so hopefully that's enough. If it is, I'll rebase my work on top of
> > your patch and retest.
>
> So - my series is now working with a bit of adaptation to run on top of
> your patch, and I think the overall result is better. So:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
>

Applied to drm-misc-next.