[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7b27887-ce00-c173-a7e7-8ad3470154f5@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:03:33 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: add force_intercept_exceptions_mask
On 3/9/22 13:31, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Question: is it worth it? Since I am very busy with various things, this feature,
> beeing just small debug help which I used once in a while doesn't get much time from me.
I agree it's not very much worth.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists