[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da421a98-cca2-aece-b3a2-eb83e9795801@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:46:50 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: mark synthetic SMM vmexit as SVM_EXIT_SW
On 3/1/22 18:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> The fact that we have a stale VM exit reason in vmcb without this
> patch which can be in theory consumed somewhere down the road.
>
> This stale vm exit reason also appears in the tracs which is
> very misleading.
Let's put it in the commit message:
This makes it a bit easier to read the KVM trace, and avoids
other potential problems due to a stale vmexit reason in the vmcb. If
SVM_EXIT_SW somehow reaches svm_invoke_exit_handler(), instead,
svm_check_exit_valid() will return false and a WARN will be logged.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists