[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220309155900.485376999@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:00:16 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 43/43] ARM: fix build error when BPF_SYSCALL is disabled
From: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
commit 330f4c53d3c2d8b11d86ec03a964b86dc81452f5 upstream.
It was missing a semicolon.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Fixes: 25875aa71dfe ("ARM: include unprivileged BPF status in Spectre V2 reporting").
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/spectre.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/spectre.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/spectre.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ static bool _unprivileged_ebpf_enabled(v
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
return !sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled;
#else
- return false
+ return false;
#endif
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists