linux-kernel - Re: nvme-host: disk corruptions when issuing IDENTIFY commands via ioctl()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220309011429.GA3948855@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:14:29 -0800
From:   Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, axboe@...com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Ming Lei <minlei@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nvme-host: disk corruptions when issuing IDENTIFY commands via
 ioctl()

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:02:42AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:39:04PM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:18:47AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Given NVMe spec states that data length of IDENTIFY command should be
> > > 4096bytes, and PRP list can't be used. 
> > > 
> > > So looks nvme driver need to validate the command before submitting to
> > > hardware, otherwise any buggy application can break FS or memory easily.
> > 
> > No way. The driver does not police the user passthrough interface for
> > these kinds of things.
> 
> So you trust application to provide correct data always?
>
> From user viewpoint, this defect provides one easy hole to break FS or
> memory, it is one serious issue, IMO. The FS/memory corruption can
> be reproduced easily even in VM.

It doesn't seem so serious considering it's been this way for 10 years,
and we already knew about this. It's even been reported before:

  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2013-August/000365.html

> > It couldn't ever be complete or future proof if
> > it did.
> 
> But the spec states clearly the data length of IDENTIFY command is 4096
> and PRP list can't be used, so why do you think it isn't complete or
> future proof to validate data length of IDENTIFY in nvme driver?

The current spec says that opcode uses 4k today. What about some time in
the future? And why are you focusing on Identify anyway? The same
potential for abuse exists with any of the other numerous opcodes that
don't have a fixed transfer size, most of which the driver couldn't
possibly ever know what the transfer length is supposed to be. This is a
priviledged operation; the applications get to own the fallout if they
misuse it.