linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for snapshot names encryption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ilsl7ltp.fsf@brahms.olymp>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:34:58 +0000
From:   Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for snapshot names encryption

Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de> writes:

> Hi!
>
> So, I've changed this code back into and RFC as I'm not sure yet if this
> is it's final form.  I think the 2 patches in this series should probably
> be squashed into a single patch.  I decided to keep them separate as the
> 1st one is simple (it's the same patch I had already sent), and the 2nd
> patch adds a lot more complexity to the whole thing.
>
> So, I've looked at Xiubo initial patch for handling snapshots long names.
> It was complex, of course, and it required extra MDS changes.  I *think*
> my approach is slightly simpler, but I'm not entirely sure yet that I'm
> handling every case.
>
> In order to test this code the following PRs are required:
>
>   mds: add protection from clients without fscrypt support #45073
>   mds: use the whole string as the snapshot long name #45192
>   mds: support alternate names for snapshots #45224
>   mds: limit the snapshot names to 240 characters #45312
>
> Comments are welcome, I'm still testing these patches and I do expect to
> find that something is still missing.  And I do expect to find bugs.
> These strings parsing scares me a lot, but I couldn't see a simpler
> approach.

Again, I forgot to mention in the cover-letter that handling
base64-encoded snapshots that start with '_' is still missing.  That's
next on my list.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

>
> Luís Henriques (2):
>   ceph: add support for encrypted snapshot names
>   ceph: add support for handling encrypted snapshot names in subtree
>
>  fs/ceph/crypto.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  fs/ceph/crypto.h |   9 ++-
>  fs/ceph/dir.c    |   9 +++
>  fs/ceph/inode.c  |  13 +++++
>  4 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>