[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa1b89b5-d13e-3dc8-ec2c-62823ea10021@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:33:27 +0800
From: "Guozihua (Scott)" <guozihua@...wei.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <wangweiyang2@...wei.com>,
<xiujianfeng@...wei.com>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<peterhuewe@....de>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Fix memory leak in tpmm_chip_alloc
On 2022/3/7 21:45, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 06:48:27PM +0800, GUO Zihua wrote:
>> Fix a memory leak in tpmm_chip_alloc. devm_add_action_or_reset would
>> call put_device on error, while tpm->devs is left untouched. Call
>> put_device on tpm->devs as well if devm_add_action_or_reset returns an
>> error.
>>
>> Fixes: fdc915f7f719 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm")
>> Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> index b009e7479b70..0a92334e8c40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> @@ -308,6 +308,12 @@ static int tpm_class_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void tpm_chip_free(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> + put_device(&chip->devs);
>> + put_device(&chip->dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * tpm_chip_alloc() - allocate a new struct tpm_chip instance
>> * @pdev: device to which the chip is associated
>> @@ -396,8 +402,7 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>> return chip;
>>
>> out:
>> - put_device(&chip->devs);
>> - put_device(&chip->dev);
>> + tpm_chip_free(chip);
>> return ERR_PTR(rc);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_alloc);
>> @@ -420,8 +425,8 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>> return chip;
>>
>> rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev,
>> - (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
>> - &chip->dev);
>> + (void (*)(void *)) tpm_chip_free,
>> + chip);
>> if (rc)
>> return ERR_PTR(rc);
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
> Please test against the latest in
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git
>
> and share your results.
>
> BR, Jarkko
> .
Hi Jarkko,
I'll do that. Do we have a test set for TPM? Or do we just build and run
it and see if everything works as expected?
This is an error handling optimization BTW.
--
Best
GUO Zihua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists