[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a5380706e5a1679bf8e5967252335e1f2167065f.1646944472.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:38:40 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@....com>,
David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@....com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@...cle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: nSVM: Restore next_rip when doing L1 -> L2 event re-injection
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
According to APM 15.7.1 "State Saved on Exit" the next_rip field can be
zero after a VMEXIT in some cases.
Yet, it is used by the CPU for the return address pushed on stack when
injecting INT3 or INTO exception or a software interrupt.
Restore this field to the L1-provided value if zeroed by the CPU when
re-injecting a L1-provided event into L2.
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 5b128baa5e57..760dd0e070ea 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -385,6 +385,44 @@ static int svm_skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return 1;
}
+/*
+ * According to APM 15.7.1 "State Saved on Exit" the next_rip field can
+ * be zero after a VMEXIT in some cases.
+ * Yet, it is used by the CPU for the return address pushed on stack when
+ * injecting INT3 or INTO exception or a software interrupt.
+ *
+ * Restore this field to the L1-provided value if zeroed by the CPU when
+ * re-injecting a L1-provided event into L2.
+ */
+static void maybe_fixup_next_rip(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool uses_err)
+{
+ struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+ u32 err_vmcb = uses_err ? svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err : 0;
+ u32 err_inject = uses_err ? svm->nested.ctl.event_inj_err : 0;
+
+ /* No nRIP Save feature? Then nothing to fix up. */
+ if (!nrips)
+ return;
+
+ /* The fix only applies to event injection into a L2. */
+ if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If the current next_rip field is already non-zero assume the CPU had
+ * returned the correct address during the last VMEXIT.
+ */
+ if (svm->vmcb->control.next_rip)
+ return;
+
+ /* Is this a L1 -> L2 event re-injection? */
+ if (!event_inj_same(svm->vmcb->control.event_inj, err_vmcb,
+ svm->nested.ctl.event_inj, err_inject))
+ return;
+
+ svm->vmcb->control.next_rip = svm->nested.ctl.next_rip;
+}
+
static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -415,6 +453,9 @@ static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
| (has_error_code ? SVM_EVTINJ_VALID_ERR : 0)
| SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_EXEPT;
svm->vmcb->control.event_inj_err = error_code;
+
+ if (kvm_exception_is_soft(nr))
+ maybe_fixup_next_rip(vcpu, true);
}
static void svm_init_erratum_383(void)
@@ -3331,6 +3372,8 @@ static void svm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
SVM_EVTINJ_VALID;
if (vcpu->arch.interrupt.soft) {
svm->vmcb->control.event_inj |= SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_SOFT;
+
+ maybe_fixup_next_rip(vcpu, false);
} else {
svm->vmcb->control.event_inj |= SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists