[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220310215652.32025-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:56:52 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add a third Alderlake CPU model number
Existing suffix conventions only cover mobile/desktop/server options.
But this isn't any of those. Use "_N" as it matches the Intel naming
convention for this part.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
---
Peter: What do you think about suffix proliferation? I tried to
get an answer about the target market segment for this CPU, but
didn't get an answer that is at all useful.
arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
index 048b6d5aff50..2f7b608f3e55 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
#define INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE 0x97 /* Golden Cove / Gracemont */
#define INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE_L 0x9A /* Golden Cove / Gracemont */
+#define INTEL_FAM6_ALDERLAKE_N 0xBE
#define INTEL_FAM6_RAPTORLAKE 0xB7
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists