[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-LrVjvY8wAqZtUTFS8V9ng2AD3jB1DOZvkagPOp3Sbq-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:43:20 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
syzbot+e223cf47ec8ae183f2a0@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv6: fix skb_over_panic in __ip6_append_data
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:13:28 -0800 Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> > index 4788f6b37053..6d45112322a0 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> > @@ -1649,6 +1649,16 @@ static int __ip6_append_data(struct sock *sk,
> > skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
> > skb->ip_summed = csummode;
> > skb->csum = 0;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Check if there is still room for payload
> > + */
>
> TBH I think the check is self-explanatory. Not worth a banner comment,
> for sure.
>
> > + if (fragheaderlen >= mtu) {
> > + err = -EMSGSIZE;
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + goto error;
> > + }
>
> Not sure if Willem prefers this placement, but seems like we can lift
> this check out of the loop, as soon as fragheaderlen and mtu are known.
>
> > /* reserve for fragmentation and ipsec header */
> > skb_reserve(skb, hh_len + sizeof(struct frag_hdr) +
> > dst_exthdrlen);
Just updating this boundary check will do?
if (mtu < fragheaderlen ||
((mtu - fragheaderlen) & ~7) + fragheaderlen <
sizeof(struct frag_hdr))
goto emsgsize;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists