linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] TPM DEVICE DRIVER updates for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yil8p6OVFzXH1pzM@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:20:55 -0800
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] TPM DEVICE DRIVER updates for v5.18

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:50:44AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:50:30PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:10:31AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 02:58:49PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > >       KEYS: asymmetric: enforce that sig algo matches key algo
> > > 
> > > It looks like you applied v1 of this patch
> > > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220201003414.55380-2-ebiggers@kernel.org) rather
> > > than v2 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208052448.409152-2-ebiggers@kernel.org).
> > > I think that v2 is necessary because some callers of
> > > public_key_verify_signature() leave pkey_algo as NULL.
> > > 
> > > Sorry for not spotting that you applied v1 earlier.
> > > 
> > > - Eric
> > 
> > I can do another pull request.
> 
> Eric, does 'next' branch in
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git 
> 
> look good to you now?
> 

Yes, that looks good, thanks.

- Eric