lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YimAIPBs4FNlXIs3@matsya>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:05:44 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Yongzhi Liu <lyz_cs@....edu.cn>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 012/105] dmaengine: shdma: Fix runtime PM imbalance
 on error

On 09-03-22, 15:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2022-03-09 14:40:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:35:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > On Wed 2022-03-09 12:58:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:54:20AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > From: Yongzhi Liu <lyz_cs@....edu.cn>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 455896c53d5b803733ddd84e1bf8a430644439b6 ]
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > pm_runtime_get_() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > > > > > > when it returns an error code, thus a matching decrement is needed on
> > > > > > > the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This patch will break things.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Notice that -ret is ignored (checked 4.4 and 5.10), so we don't
> > > > > > actually abort/return error; we just printk. We'll do two
> > > > > > pm_runtime_put's after the "fix".
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please drop from -stable.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > It was discussed during AUTOSEL review:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:25:10 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
> > > > > > From: 刘永志 <lyz_cs@....edu.cn>
> > > > > > To: pavel machek <pavel@...x.de>
> > > > > > Cc: sasha levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.16 24/30] dmaengine: shdma: Fix runtime PM
> > > > > > 	imbalance on error
> > > > > 
> > > > > So 5.15 and 5.16 is ok, but older is not?
> > > > 
> > > > I believe commit is wrong for mainline and all stable releases, and
> > > > author seems to agree. Drop from everywhere.
> > > 
> > > Is it reverted in Linus's tree yet?
> > 
> > It will take you a minute to check.
> > 
> > Take a look at the patch. There's no return in error path, thus doing
> > runtime_put is clearly bogus. Should take you less than minute to
> > verify.
> > 
> > Please drop the patch.
> 
> I want to have it reverted in Linus's tree as well, otherwise that's a
> regression that people will hit.

I have reverted now, it will be in -next tomorrow and in mainline during
upcoming merge window

-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ