[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgpToUf0XORoH_t7Wrqv3=VcqCCDV2qnCbqjtCsrd3Cyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:35:22 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove a.out support
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 3:29 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Kees can you pick this one up in for-next/execve as well?
>
> It still applies cleanly and the actual patch seems to have gotten lost
> in the conversation about what more we could do.
Side note: there are similar other turds if a.out goes away, ie on
alpha it's OSF4_COMPAT, and it enables support for a couple of legacy
OSF/1 system calls.
I think that was also discussed in the (old) a.out deprecation thread
back in 2019..
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists