[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f76e647-49fa-f3e2-6931-26ca960f3879@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 04:42:13 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <p.yadav@...com>
CC: <michael@...le.cc>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<zhengxunli@...c.com.tw>, <jaimeliao@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: spi-nor: core: Introduce SPI_NOR_DTR_BSWAP16
no_sfdp_flag
On 3/2/22 14:30, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 18/02/22 04:59PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Introduce SPI_NOR_DTR_BSWAP16 flag for flashes that don't define the
>> mandatory BFPT table. When set it indicates that the byte order of 16-bit
>> words is swapped when read in 8D-8D-8D mode compared to 1-1-1 mode.
>
> Is there any flash that currently needs this flag but does not define
> BFPT? If there is no user, let's not add it. It can always be added
> later.
it's needed by mx66lm1g45g, the flash that I'm currently working on.
It doesn't define SFDP tables, at least the one that I currently have.
Let me add support for it in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists