linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 -next] perf/marvell: cn10k Fix build error without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1URfVa25Yqy_CwgiC3JY3k+-M_wqMNSXqgpgT6cPGuHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:41:27 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>, bbudiredla@...vell.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] perf/marvell: cn10k Fix build error without CONFIG_OF

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 7:50 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c:723:21: error: ‘cn10k_ddr_pmu_of_match’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘cn10k_ddr_pmu_driver’?
>          .of_match_table = cn10k_ddr_pmu_of_match,
>                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Remove the #ifdef around the match table, because CONFIG_OF is always enabled on arm64.
>
> Fixes: 7cf83e222bce ("perf/marvell: CN10k DDR performance monitor support")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> v2: Remove the #ifdef macro as Arnd suggested

Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>