[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gnzDMWgzw9xW6PLRvDgw18RL35NtWsKYRV391SRWSuQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 17:02:05 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
Muchun Song <smuchun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] mm: remove range parameter from follow_invalidate_pte()
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 12:30 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> The only user (DAX) of range parameter of follow_invalidate_pte()
> is gone, it safe to remove the range paramter and make it static
> to simlify the code.
>
Looks good, I suspect this savings is still valid if the "just use
page_mkclean_one" directly feedback is workable.
Otherwise you can add:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists