linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/45] x86: Kernel IBT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YinP49gEl2zUVekz@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:16:03 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "joao@...rdrivepizza.com" <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
        "hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "alyssa.milburn@...el.com" <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>,
        "mbenes@...e.cz" <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/45] x86: Kernel IBT

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:22:59AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra
> > Sent: 10 March 2022 09:05
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 04:30:28PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > 
> > > I observed the following error when building with
> > > CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_FULL=y enabled:
> > >
> > > ld.lld: error: ld-temp.o <inline asm>:7:2: symbol 'ibt_selftest_ip' is
> > > already defined
> > >         ibt_selftest_ip:
> > >         ^
> > >
> > > Seems to come from
> > > commit a802350ba65a ("x86/ibt: Add IBT feature, MSR and #CP handling")
> > >
> > > Commenting out the label in the inline asm, I then observed:
> > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: identify_cpu()+0x6d0: sibling call from
> > > callable instruction with modified stack frame
> > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: identify_cpu()+0x6e0: stack state
> > > mismatch: cfa1=4+64 cfa2=4+8
> > > These seemed to disappear when I kept CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_FULL=y but then
> > > disabled CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT. (perhaps due to the way I hacked out
> > > the ibt_selftest_ip label).
> > 
> > Urgh.. I'm thikning this is a clang bug :/
> > 
> > The code in question is:
> > 
> > 
> > void ibt_selftest_ip(void); /* code label defined in asm below */
> > 
> > DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
> > {
> > 	/* ... */
> > 
> > 	if (unlikely(regs->ip == (unsigned long)ibt_selftest_ip)) {
> > 		regs->ax = 0;
> > 		return;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	/* ... */
> > }
> > 
> > bool ibt_selftest(void)
> > {
> > 	unsigned long ret;
> > 
> > 	asm ("	lea ibt_selftest_ip(%%rip), %%rax\n\t"
> > 	     ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE
> > 	     "	jmp *%%rax\n\t"
> > 	     "ibt_selftest_ip:\n\t"
> > 	     UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> > 	     ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> > 	     "	nop\n\t"
> > 
> > 	     : "=a" (ret) : : "memory");
> > 
> > 	return !ret;
> > }
> > 
> > There is only a single definition of that symbol, the one in the asm.
> > The other is a declaration, which is used in the exception handler to
> > compare against regs->ip.
> 
> LTO has probably inlined it twice.

Indeed, adding noinline to ibt_selftest() makes it work.


---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index d8bbc705efe5..0c737cc31ee5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -781,7 +781,8 @@ int3_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data
 	return NOTIFY_STOP;
 }
 
-static void __init int3_selftest(void)
+/* Must be noinline to ensure uniqueness of int3_selftest_ip. */
+static noinline void __init int3_selftest(void)
 {
 	static __initdata struct notifier_block int3_exception_nb = {
 		.notifier_call	= int3_exception_notify,
@@ -794,9 +795,8 @@ static void __init int3_selftest(void)
 	/*
 	 * Basically: int3_magic(&val); but really complicated :-)
 	 *
-	 * Stick the address of the INT3 instruction into int3_selftest_ip,
-	 * then trigger the INT3, padded with NOPs to match a CALL instruction
-	 * length.
+	 * INT3 padded with NOP to CALL_INSN_SIZE. The int3_exception_nb
+	 * notifier above will emulate CALL for us.
 	 */
 	asm volatile ("int3_selftest_ip:\n\t"
 		      ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 837cc3c7d4f4..fb89a2f1011f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY(exc_overflow)
 
 static __ro_after_init bool ibt_fatal = true;
 
-void ibt_selftest_ip(void); /* code label defined in asm below */
+extern void ibt_selftest_ip(void); /* code label defined in asm below */
 
 enum cp_error_code {
 	CP_EC        = (1 << 15) - 1,
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(user_mode(regs) || (error_code & CP_EC) != CP_ENDBR))
 		return;
 
-	if (unlikely(regs->ip == (unsigned long)ibt_selftest_ip)) {
+	if (unlikely(regs->ip == (unsigned long)&ibt_selftest_ip)) {
 		regs->ax = 0;
 		return;
 	}
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
 	BUG();
 }
 
-bool ibt_selftest(void)
+/* Must be noinline to ensure uniqueness of ibt_selftest_ip. */
+noinline bool ibt_selftest(void)
 {
 	unsigned long ret;