[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e442e6b1-2612-d8fb-793a-5e6f11851f21@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:19:24 -0600
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
To: niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, mchehab@...nel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com, rric@...nel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: altera: Add SDRAM ECC check for U-Boot
On 3/4/22 19:41, niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com wrote:
> From: Rabara Niravkumar L <niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com>
>
> A bug in legacy U-Boot causes a crash during SDRAM boot if ECC
> is not enabled in the bitstream but enabled in the Linux config.
>
> Memory mapped read of the ECC Enabled bit was only enabled
> if U-Boot determined ECC was enabled in the bitstream.
>
> The Linux driver checks the ECC enable bit using a memory map
> read. In the ECC disabled bitstream case, U-Boot didn't
> enable ECC register memory map reads and since they are not
> allowed this results in a crash.
>
> This patch always reads the ECC Enable register through a
> SMC call which is always allowed and it works with legacy
> and current U-Boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rabara Niravkumar L <niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index 5dd29789f97d..e7e8e624a436 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> @@ -1083,8 +1083,46 @@ static int __init __maybe_unused altr_init_a10_ecc_device_type(char *compat)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_SDRAM
>
> +/*
> + * A legacy U-Boot bug only enabled memory mapped access to the ECC Enable
> + * register if ECC is enabled. Linux checks the ECC Enable register to
> + * determine ECC status.
> + * Use an SMC call (which always works) to determine ECC enablement.
> + */
> +static int altr_s10_sdram_check_ecc_deps(struct altr_edac_device_dev *device)
> +{
> + const struct edac_device_prv_data *prv = device->data;
> + unsigned long sdram_ecc_addr;
> + struct arm_smccc_res result;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + phys_addr_t sdram_addr;
> + u32 read_reg;
> + int ret;
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "altr,sdr-ctl");
> + if (!np)
> + goto sdram_err;
> +
> + sdram_addr = of_translate_address(np, of_get_address(np, 0,
> + NULL, NULL));
> + of_node_put(np);
> + sdram_ecc_addr = (unsigned long)sdram_addr + prv->ecc_en_ofst;
> + arm_smccc_smc(INTEL_SIP_SMC_REG_READ, sdram_ecc_addr,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &result);
> + read_reg = (unsigned int)result.a1;
> + ret = (int)result.a0;
> + if (!ret && (read_reg & prv->ecc_enable_mask))
> + return 0;
> +
> +sdram_err:
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "%s: No ECC present or ECC disabled.\n",
> + device->edac_dev_name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> static const struct edac_device_prv_data s10_sdramecc_data = {
> - .setup = altr_check_ecc_deps,
> + .setup = altr_s10_sdram_check_ecc_deps,
> .ce_clear_mask = ALTR_S10_ECC_SERRPENA,
> .ue_clear_mask = ALTR_S10_ECC_DERRPENA,
> .ecc_enable_mask = ALTR_S10_ECC_EN,
Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists