[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YioK7llYzEUrAw/r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:27:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: 'Josh Poimboeuf' <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"joao@...rdrivepizza.com" <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alyssa.milburn@...el.com" <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>,
"mbenes@...e.cz" <mbenes@...e.cz>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"alexei.starovoitov@...il.com" <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/45] x86: Kernel IBT
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:37:50PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> I'm wondering what actually happens to loadable modules?
They work just fine..
> Especially those built 'out of tree',
> potentially with a different compiler,
> and maybe containing binary 'blobs'.
-EDONTCARE, you're on your own and get to keep whatever pieces.
In fact, the more pieces I can get you, the better I feel about it.
> The requirement to run programs on old distributions means
> that things get compiled with quite old versions of gcc.
> For instance RHEL7 is gcc 4.8.5.
Min GCC is 5.1. If you want Kernel IBT you get to use GCC-9 (or 8 with
backports) but I'd recommend using GCC-10 or later since before that the
IBT code-gen is pretty stupid.
If you build modules using another compiler than the main kernel, you
again get to keep the pieces.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists