[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220311160239.GE227945@lothringen>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:02:39 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yu Liao <liaoyu15@...wei.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@...y.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/19] rcu/context-tracking: Move RCU-dynticks internal
functions to context_tracking
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:07:05PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 04:48:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Move the core RCU eqs/dynticks functions to context tracking so that
> > we can later merge all that code within context tracking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>
> I am not sure that you want rcu_dynticks_task_enter() and friends in
> context tracking, but I have no objection to them living there. ;-)
I initially tried to keep them in RCU headers but their use of "current"
would imply a circular dependency with sched.h.
Not much appealing alternatives could be:
* macrofying them
* uninline them and keep in RCU
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists